ITEFLAC is an international quality assurance agency, working to improve quality assurance standards of TEFL/TESOL organizations all over the world. With its global network of experts, ITEFLAC grants accreditation to TEFL/TESOL course providers.
The International TEFL Accreditation Council (ITEFLAC) confers accreditation to TEFL / TESOL Course providers and institutions. The accreditation process is structured in such a way as not to require on-site visits. This process ensures that accreditation is both affordable and accessible to start ups, small institutions and providers in all countries – thus creating a level playing field. The accreditation process is designed to improve standards and quality and promote professional behaviour in accordance with our Code of Professional Practice.
TEFL Accreditation Process
Stage 1 – Submission & Scrutiny of Application Form
The application form consists of 16 pages in total. This includes Appendices 1,2,3,4 and the reference (page 12). All sections are to be completed.
On pages 10/11 of the application form you will find a form entitled ‘Checklist of documents to be sent at stage 2’. This document is a checklist of documents that must be sent at stage 2 of the accreditation process. You must mark an ‘x’ if you have the corresponding documentation. If the documentation does not apply, then mark ‘N/A’. If you do not have a particular document, then leave the field blank.
The initial information provided to us will be inspected and assessed by a member of our Evaluation Council. If all the information provided is deemed satisfactory and complete, then we can move onto the next stage in the process. If it does not, we may inform the institution why they are unlikely to gain accreditation at this point, and then provide advice and guidance on ways they can improve or rectify the problems we find.
Stage 2 – Submission of Accompanying Documents & Evidence
ITEFLAC will request the submission of accompanying documentation and evidence to support the institution’s application for accreditation (as per checklist). The Evaluation Council will focus on how the institution complies with immigration regulations; the quality of management and student support; the health and safety of the premises; and the suitability of the available resources for the courses. *Each document/file submitted must be named according to its corresponding category and number as per checklist – for example – ‘Copy or example of enrollment form’ > should be named H57 and so on. This will assist us with cross referencing.
The Evaluation Council will need to examine procedural documentation, attendance recording systems, examples of marked work and feedback forms from students, and statutory documentation, such as approvals from the local Ministry of Higher Education (if required) and fire regulations.
During stage 2, the Evaluation Council will review what documents you consider not applicable to your institution. If there are some documents outstanding (which are considered ‘vital’), then we will mutually determine a suitable time frame as to when you can submit theses documents. *In most cases, outstanding documents will not impede your path to accreditation as we are here to help you improve your standards and quality and promote professional behaviour in accordance with our Code of Professional Practice.
After careful consideration of all supporting documentation and evidence, the Accreditation Council will prepare and submit a report, which will recommend whether or not Stage 3 should take place. If there are any areas the institute needs to improve on before moving on to Stage 3, these will be identified in the report.
This report will be carefully considered by the Evaluation Council, who will then weigh up the information contained and decide whether or not to proceed onto the next stage. If they decide that the institution is not ready to move onto stage 3, the institution will be informed of this and given the chance to appeal against the decision, if they can provide grounds for reconsideration.
Stage 3 – Accreditation
This stage is mainly focused on weighing up the evidence of the institution’s ability to uphold and maintain the standards needed for an accreditation. The final decision on accreditation will be then be decided by the Evaluation Council.
At the International TEFL Accreditation Council (ITEFLAC), accreditation is founded on the principles of self-review and evaluation. ITEFLAC promotes a rating system through which we do not pass or fail course providers or institutions. The main purpose of ITEFLAC is to promote TEFL / TESOL education worldwide.
ITEFLAC has a Points Profile system that does not discourage the newly established or smaller institutions by disqualifying them. The Points Profile system determines strengths, weaknesses and offers recommendations to the course providers and institutions with which they can improve their standards. Points are assigned to each aspect of the eight key performance indicators (see ‘Standards & Evidence‘). These scores are put together to form a matrix that measures the quality of a course provider or institution from different perspectives. The profile point system is intelligently designed to determine strengths and areas that need improvement to match the international standards. The final matrix gives the overall picture of a course provider’s or institution’s educational standards and also recommends ways to improve them.
What is the Points Profile?
ITEFLAC’s Points Profile System is developed on the bench mark standards in education’s best practices and consists of 8 key performance indicators. It provides a score of all quantitative measures of the course provider or institution that are deemed to fit the standards. *It is important to note that not all aspects of the key performance indicators may be applicable to all course providers or institutions.
0 Points – Indicates the institution does not have this subjective factor.
5 – 9 Points – Indicating the institution has this subjective factor but it does not address complete dimension’s criteria.
10 Points – Indicating the subjective factors in this section are fully met and explicitly address students’ needs.
If a course provider or institution does not have what may be considered a ‘vital’ aspect of a key performance indicator, then a suitable time frame will be mutually agreed upon whereby the provider can submit this aspect.
Report, Recommendations & Suggestions
A course provider or institution will be granted a Points Profile, which is a measure of its match to the globally accepted standards and best academic practices. A report as well as recommendations and suggestions on ways to improve a course provider’s or institution’s educational standards will also be provided.
TEFL Accreditation Fees
ITEFLAC’s initial evaluation and accreditation is free for the first year.
Initial accreditation is valid for one year and is renewable on an annual basis for a fee of US$750 or US$1000 for two (2) years irrespective of the number of courses a provider or institution offers.
ITEFLAC does not charge a provider or institute a fee for each student enrolled on their courses.
*Payment is accepted via Bank Transfer.